As J. Harrison and S. Pliska formulate it in their classic paper : “it was a desire to better understand their formula which originally motivated our study, ”. The fundamental theorems of asset pricing provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a Harrison, J. Michael; Pliska, Stanley R. (). “Martingales and. The famous result of Harrison–Pliska [?], known also as the Fundamental Theorem on Asset (or Arbitrage) Pricing (FTAP) asserts that a frictionless financial.
|Published (Last):||21 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||14.59 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: When the stock price process is assumed to follow a more general sigma-martingale or semimartingalethen the concept of arbitrage is too narrow, and a stronger concept such as no free lunch with vanishing risk must be used to describe these opportunities in an infinite dimensional setting.
Here is how to contribute. When applied to binomial markets, this theorem harrisson a very precise condition that is extremely easy to verify see Tangent.
Pliska and in by F. Search for items with the same title.
Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading J. A complete market is one in which every contingent claim can be replicated. Given a random variable or quantity X that can only assume the values x 1x 2The fundamental theorems of asset pricing also: Views Read Edit View history.
Is your work missing from RePEc? More general versions of the theorem were proven in by M. A measure Q that satisifies i and ii is known as a risk neutral measure. Note We define in this section the concepts of conditional probability, conditional expectation and martingale for random quantities or processes that can only take a finite number of values.
The First Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing
Michael Harrison and Stanley R. Recall that the probability of an event must be a number between 0 and 1.
harrisn More specifically, an arbitrage opportunity is a self-finacing trading strategy such that the probability that the value of the final portfolio is negative is zero and the probability that it is positive is not 0and we are not really concerned about the exact probability of this last event.
This turns out to be enough for our purposes because in our examples at any given time t we have only a finite number of possible prices for the risky asset how many?
Pliska Stochastic Processes and their Applications, vol. Also notice that in the second condition we are not requiring the price process of the risky asset to be a martingale i. A more formal justification would require some background in mathematical proofs and abstract concepts of probability which are out of the scope of these lessons.
By using the definitions above prove that X is a lpiska.
A haerison version of this theorem was proven by M. This can be explained by the following reasoning: Verify the result given in d for the Examples given in the previous lessons.
Extend the previous lliska to an arbitrary time horizon T. The justification of each of the steps above does not have to be necessarily formal. The discounted price processX 0: Notices of the AMS.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
In this lesson we will present the first fundamental theorem of asset pricing, a result that provides an alternative way to test the existence of arbitrage opportunities in a given market. Contingent ; claim ; valuation ; continous ; trading ; diffusion ; processes ; option ; pricing ; representation ; of ; martingales ; semimartingales ; stochastic ; integrals search for similar items in EconPapers Date: In a discrete i.
To make this statement precise we first review the concepts of conditional probability and conditional expectation. May Learn how and when to remove this template message.